On 22. 12. 19 12:01, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On Sunday, December 22, 2019 3:11:51 AM MST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
1 was rejected because there was no hope for a python3 port because of lack
of development.
This is exactly the scenario that makes no sense to deny. If the package is
still maintained, regardless of lack of changes to the software, why simply
throw out working software?
Because the maintainers of its dependencies won't maintain them just for a
decade old dead software. Please, stop spreading this FUD about FESCo outright
denying requests for Python 2 exceptions. In a half year old thread about a
package that was retired 4 months ago because it wasn't installable - with
coordination from the maintainer.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
