On Sunday, December 22, 2019 4:56:52 AM MST Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 22. 12. 19 12:01, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > > On Sunday, December 22, 2019 3:11:51 AM MST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > >> 1 was rejected because there was no hope for a python3 port because of > >> lack of development. > > > > > > This is exactly the scenario that makes no sense to deny. If the package > > is still maintained, regardless of lack of changes to the software, why > > simply throw out working software? > > > Because the maintainers of its dependencies won't maintain them just for a > decade old dead software. Please, stop spreading this FUD about FESCo > outright denying requests for Python 2 exceptions. In a half year old > thread about a package that was retired 4 months ago because it wasn't > installable - with coordination from the maintainer. So long as Python2 remains installable, I don't see why you feel the need to rip it out of the distro. -- John M. Harris, Jr. Splentity _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
