On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 01:39:42 +0000 Mat Booth <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 21:13, Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:10:00 -0800 > > Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 10:24:16AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > > > > > Side note: Considering that there are comparatively few armv7hl > > > > builders, I wonder why a rather big share of my noarch builds > > > > gets scheduled to run on them. Naively, I'd think that armv7hl > > > > should be busy doing builds for "archful" stuff since they're > > > > the slowest > > > > > > I'm not sure why that is. I would expect them to be busy more as > > > well. Do note that we are bringing some more hardware on line > > > after the new year, which should give us more armv7 builders. > > > > > > > builders and there are the fewest of them, except for s390x. > > > > > > s390x now is a great deal faster. It's often the one that finishes > > > right after x86_64/i686. > > > > even ahead x86_64/i686 sometimes :-) > > > > This is great to hear! Until now s390x was the slowest arch for Java > by quite a wide margin; with the special Java 8 JIT package[1] > installed, even 32bit arm was quicker than s390x :-o because there is no JIT for s390x in OpenJDK 1.8.0, it has been added in some later version (OpenJDK 10?). So until this version is the new default Java, s390x will be slow for Java. Dan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
