On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 21:13, Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:10:00 -0800
> Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 10:24:16AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > >
> > > Side note: Considering that there are comparatively few armv7hl
> > > builders, I wonder why a rather big share of my noarch builds gets
> > > scheduled to run on them. Naively, I'd think that armv7hl should be
> > > busy doing builds for "archful" stuff since they're the slowest
> >
> > I'm not sure why that is. I would expect them to be busy more as
> > well. Do note that we are bringing some more hardware on line after
> > the new year, which should give us more armv7 builders.
> >
> > > builders and there are the fewest of them, except for s390x.
> >
> > s390x now is a great deal faster. It's often the one that finishes
> > right after x86_64/i686.
>
> even ahead x86_64/i686 sometimes :-)
>
This is great to hear! Until now s390x was the slowest arch for Java by quite a wide margin; with the special Java 8 JIT package[1] installed, even 32bit arm was quicker than s390x :-o
[1] "java-1.8.0-openjdk-aarch32" -- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=22627
--
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
