On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 10:24:16AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Side note: Considering that there are comparatively few armv7hl > builders, I wonder why a rather big share of my noarch builds gets > scheduled to run on them. Naively, I'd think that armv7hl should be > busy doing builds for "archful" stuff since they're the slowest I'm not sure why that is. I would expect them to be busy more as well. Do note that we are bringing some more hardware on line after the new year, which should give us more armv7 builders. > builders and there are the fewest of them, except for s390x. s390x now is a great deal faster. It's often the one that finishes right after x86_64/i686. > Since most of the noarch stuff I do for fedora nowadays is Java > (*sigh*), these Java-on-arm builds are rather slow. Maybe that's bad > luck, or maybe the task scheduler hates me :) Yeah, not sure. We can try and investigate more. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
