Re: Openness: Apache as a guiding model (was Re: GFS removed??? )

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le samedi 19 mars 2005 à 16:00 +0200, Ville Skyttà a Ãcrit :
> On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 09:45 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:15:33 +0100 (CET), Nicolas Mailhot
> > <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Choosing to ignore Axel's input on this subject is so utterly ridiculous
> > > from a technical point of view one can only conclude other considerations
> > > are taking over now.

> > I would find it rather odd and malicious if Ville now
> > ignored Axel, considering Ville has explicitly desired Axel's input.

> My goal is the exact opposite of ignoring people who have valuable
> contributions to the issue at hand.

Ville, I don't think anyone ever suspected you (except for rhetorical
purposes). I do personally find the weight technicalities took in this
thread very disquieting and unhealthy.

Will the Fedora project internal rules be ever important enough to
justify the ritual killing of the brother that jumped over a line traced
on the ground ? (just to show that what we've seen is very human and
sadly nothing new)

 Romulus & Remus for those who've forgotten their classics

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux