On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 20:52 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > OK, fine with me. You are loosing significant input (I'm not the only > 3rd party repo maintainer that ist staying out of closed doors), but I > hope you'll get to a decent result anyhow. If you are talking about packaging guidelines and want to further provide input, please use fedora-packaging list Maybe it was an oversight for Ville to post to fedora-maintainers, but if you had been reading the readonly copy of that list, you'd have definitely been able to spot such a grave error, and move said discussion to -packaging > Let's close this thread before someone mentiones that discussion moved > to a closed list due to moise levels here (not noting that the noise This is not a development related discussion, but more a problem you find in the way the project is run. fedora-list might be a better avenue for this, but you're right, its getting seriously off-topic for a development list > was not generated by joe-bob, but by the main actors ...) Surely you're not gender biased towards actresses -- Colin Charles, byte@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.bytebot.net/ "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mohandas Gandhi
