On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 11:42:12AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 20:31 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > > Yes, because this is not a subject to be discussed on a closed > > list. It certainly affects more than extras, core and rhel. In fact > > this discussion is more about ISVs like the dozens of 3rd party repos > > and driver packagers. > > Unfortunately it's not possible to open discussion about this type > of stuff to every joe-bob that happens to make a package, and expect > anything to get done in any reasonable amount of time. Contribution > to Extras of Core grants you a voice in the discussion of package > maintainership and certain levels of infrastructure. Same style of > setup that projects like, oh, I don't know, Apache use. OK, fine with me. You are loosing significant input (I'm not the only 3rd party repo maintainer that ist staying out of closed doors), but I hope you'll get to a decent result anyhow. Let's close this thread before someone mentiones that discussion moved to a closed list due to moise levels here (not noting that the noise was not generated by joe-bob, but by the main actors ...) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpt8Q73ZCt4o.pgp
Description: PGP signature
