Re: Openness: Apache as a guiding model (was Re: GFS removed??? )

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 02:34:27PM -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:31:21 +0100, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > AFAIK a signed agreement is needed.
> 
> again, like apache.....

Please stop draining apache into the muds. The realities there are
different altogether. No development list/discussion is closed there.

I don't want to sign any agreement to be able to express my opinions,
especially when they are unrelated to what the issue is about ... ?!?!

> if you have problems with the language in the agreement that can be
> addressed if you point out specific issues that need to be clarified.
> A comparison to apache's contributor agreement is instructive.

Yeah, right, make me an an-alphabet now.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgp5X7Te7Auaq.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux