Re: Openness: Apache as a guiding model (was Re: GFS removed??? )

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 20:31 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> Yes, because this is not a subject to be discussed on a closed
> list. It certainly affects more than extras, core and rhel. In fact
> this discussion is more about ISVs like the dozens of 3rd party repos
> and driver packagers.

Unfortunately it's not possible to open discussion about this type of
stuff to every joe-bob that happens to make a package, and expect
anything to get done in any reasonable amount of time.  Contribution to
Extras of Core grants you a voice in the discussion of package
maintainership and certain levels of infrastructure.  Same style of
setup that projects like, oh, I don't know, Apache use.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
 
Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux