On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 11:38:20AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 17.03.2005, 11:28 +0100 schrieb Axel Thimm: > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 11:11:41AM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > Am Donnerstag, den 17.03.2005, 10:30 +0100 schrieb Axel Thimm: > > > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 04:54:24PM -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > > > > > It doesn't use kernel-devel (since no such thing exists for FC <= 3), > > > > > > but a similar approach embedded into ATrpms' build system allowing to > > > > > > access kernel source configured and prepared for the targetted kernel. > > > > > > > > > > or you could just read ville's post about this to fedora-maintainers or > > > > > -extras iirc. > > > [...] > > > > W/o knowing the contents of his post, > > > Axel, read: > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2005-March/msg00096.html > > > > Thanks, as I see it Ville discussed setting up the infrastructure to > > build kernel modules against. What I miss is the discussion of the > > kernel modules themselves, e.g. what is the proposed naming/versioning > > scheme. > > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines > > Section 9, Addon Packages (kernel modules) which is rather broken due to not embedding uname -r into the package name. :( And this probably shows once again that having too many lists is a Real Bad Thing. fedora-packaging creates a (broken) standard for kernel modules while fedora-maintainers creates a standard for the infrastructure that these packages are supposed to use. Both discussions have to be carried on the same list. > > The proposed naming from my side is foo-kmdl-`uname -r`. It's short, > > sorts well with the rest of foo, doesn't need any > > yum/up2date/apt/smart special handling and users have already accepted > > this. > > There was a discussion on this on one of the other fedora-lists. But > afaik Spot is still working on the big, great, working kernel-module- > package solution... There is a working solution at ATrpms. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpPTyDHUhQph.pgp
Description: PGP signature
