Re: modular protobuf issue (Dec. 6, 2019) recap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 07.12.19 um 12:17 schrieb Miro Hrončok:
And disallow all the current default modular streams. Ship defaults as traditional RPMs. Keep modularity for alternate versions.

+1

With the current tooling modularity must be optional as it requires manual steps to fix packaging problems. With default modular streams modularity is just not optional.

I think modularity might be a way in *exceptional cases* (alternate versions) but with the current tooling I'm not even sure with that.

IMHO modules mean that we create sub-distributions thus splitting our package base (and more importantly out packager community!). This is not only a technical problem but also a social one.

Felix
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux