On 07. 12. 19 10:44, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Langdon White wrote:
## What we can do going forward:
* Increase the awareness of the policies for Fedora Modules
* Investigate an "early warning system" that would indicate to packagers
(modular and RPM) when they might be violating this policy
* Request dnf notify the user when they are enabling a superseding rpm
from a default stream module
* Request dnf provide an indication of what module is providing a
particular rpm (e.g. `dnf provides protobuf` not just indicate repo origin
but also module name and stream)
* Stop allowing default module streams, which are the main reason this was
allowed to happen, and which are just asking for this kind of conflicts.
And disallow all the current default modular streams. Ship defaults as
traditional RPMs. Keep modularity for alternate versions.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
