Langdon White wrote: > ## What we can do going forward: > * Increase the awareness of the policies for Fedora Modules > * Investigate an "early warning system" that would indicate to packagers > (modular and RPM) when they might be violating this policy > * Request dnf notify the user when they are enabling a superseding rpm > from a default stream module > * Request dnf provide an indication of what module is providing a > particular rpm (e.g. `dnf provides protobuf` not just indicate repo origin > but also module name and stream) * Stop allowing default module streams, which are the main reason this was allowed to happen, and which are just asking for this kind of conflicts. Kevin Kofler _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx