Re: What are the benefits of default modular streams over non-modular packages?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> As Petr Pisar noted earlier, default streams are designed to deliver the
> same user experience as ursine packages, therefore there is no *direct*
> advantage or disadvantage of them over ursine packages, for Fedora
> *users*.

Sorry, the "no disadvantage" part is just not true:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/6KLXZXI777Q7C7MPEO7HHWM7XGVSJVIK/

The design fails to deliver on its promise of delivering the exact same user 
experience.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux