On Saturday, November 16, 2019 12:17:10 PM MST Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 12:52:21PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > That said, we *do* need to improve things and find new ways to make > > Fedora appealing to more people, especially newer-generation infra > > types and software developers. Otherwise, we'll lose the pipeline of > > fresh blood into the project and eventually stagnate like Debian has. > > > Yes, absolutely. And of course, ultimately that's what we _want_ > modularity to do, both for users and contributors. (See again the list > of goals.) In my opinion, there's nothing about Modularity that is more appealing to "newer-generation infra types and software developers" than traditional packages. Ultimately, these people just want something that works. -- John M. Harris, Jr. Splentity _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
