On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 12:24 PM John M. Harris Jr <johnmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes, we acknowledge that with multiple versions comes the risks of > > introducing more conflicts. We balanced that out by acknowledging that > > the container space is now mature enough that separating userspaces > > when you need to run conflicting apps on the same machine is a > > reasonable solution to that problem. You've asserted elsewhere that > > you don't like containers as a technology because it's duplication of > > content and doesn't espouse your view of the ideal distribution of > > "everything uses the same (latest) version of the library". I > > understand that, but containers are here to stay and Modules help us > > provide trustworthy content for them. > > What do containers have to do with Modularity? Is this a Silverblue project > now? > I'm not sure what you're asking here. I thought it was pretty clear from the paragraph you quoted that containers are the recommended solution for doing "parallel-install" with modules. Also, the relationship goes both ways; Modules provide a trusted source of software to run in containers (as opposed to running an image that someone uploaded to a public registry). _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
