On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 at 20:10, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > What do you mean by breaking breaking because you use that term like a > > sledge hammer for anything from a 'pixel off' bug to 'too old software > > is in repos', 'too young software is in repos' , 'software is not in > > repos' to 'can't boot'. After a while, I assumed the only way I can't > > break a system is to never unbox it.. but I expect there is probably > > some way that is also a broken system. > > In this context, it is fairly clear what I meant: any current version of > Fedora (in around a year, this will mean any version still supported with > security updates at that point) will not run on those systems at all. It > will not even boot. > Actually it wasn't clear to me, so thank you for the clarification. Does it mean by this definition that Fedora is currently broken for ppc32, ia64, alpha and sparc because it no longer provides builds for them? Are what you wanting is that Fedora is more like Debian where we are building things for all platforms ever? -- Stephen J Smoogen. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
