Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 10:26 +0200, Michal Konecny wrote:
> There is still possibility to use libraries.io 
> instead of Anitya, but there are some issues:
> - lack of downstream mapping (this could be easily solved by some 
> database with only downstream mapping)
> - lack of custom project additions (libraries.io can only watch
> projects 
> in sources they have already implemented)

libraries.io is open source:

https://github.com/librariesio

It would be good to work with them to add these features there, rather
than to make our own database with the downstream mapping. This way all
distros can benefit, and we also don't have to do all the work of
creating and maintaining our own project.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux