Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 08:00:52 -0400
Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 12:24 AM John M. Harris Jr.
> <johnmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Monday, September 9, 2019 10:29:23 AM MST Bruno Wolff III wrote:  
> > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 14:52:07 -0000,
> > >   vvs vvs <vvs009@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >  
>  [...]  
> >  
>  [...]  
> > >
> > > I'm probably one of the few people still running Fedora on a machine that
> > > uses i686, that can't use x86_64. The machine is around 15 years old and is
> > >  costly to get replacement parts for and I'm running out of spares. I was
> > > supposed to replace the machine last month, but needed another month to
> > > save up enough to buy the rest of the replacement. I've actually work with
> > > upstream to get kernel bugs fixed for this machine.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately I run rawhide and things got shut down a little sooner
> > > than I hoped, so I'm not getting updates right now and don't want to go
> > > back to f30 with the short horizon for retirement (though I did grab an
> > > f30 kernel).
> > >
> > > I don't think you are going to find many people who both run Fedora and
> > > have to use i686.
> > >
> > > There is a cost to keeping things running on i686 and it doesn't look like
> > > it is worth paying right now. And things are looking to get worse rather
> > > than better.
> > >
> > > You have options. You can switch to another distro that will support i686
> > > for a while yet. Use f30 until it's EOL (or beyond if the machines are
> > > isolated). Or maintain your own distro. The tools for Fedora are open,
> > > so you could set up your own koji instance drawing from Fedora and applying
> > >  your fixes where needed. Getting started will probably be hard, but once
> > > things are running you'll be OK until there is a key bug you can't get
> > > fixed.  
> >
> > There are at least 4 people in this thread alone that are running Fedora on
> > x86 systems.  
> 
> Do these 4 people want to revive the x86 SIG and take on the work of
> dealing with 32-bit x86 bugs? Because they *do* exist and do cause
> problems...

I'm also using several Fedora/i686 machines and I'd like to help keep
this branch. As often, the problem is with the lack of time and the fact
that I do not know the full range of work to be done. But if one of
the current experienced i686 maintainers is willing to continue, I'll join.
I have some experience with creating and managing RPM packages.
Can I register somewhere as interested in this job?
-- 
Thanks, Franta Hanzlik
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux