Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/9/19 9:28 AM, vvs vvs wrote:
Boy, am I glad you've said that. I was waiting for it.

But looks like you are mistaken. First of all, it's not one, but at least two of them. Second, nobody else seems to be supporting your point.

E-mails to this list don't get work done. Code commits get work done.

Feel free to revive the x86 SIG and start building a i686 kernel and work with releng to re-enable the i686 repos.

Continuing this discussion will be fruitless for you and the thousands of subscribers that are not replying to you. There's a reason no one is replying. They are not interested.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux