Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/9/19 12:47 PM, vvs vvs wrote:
I don't even know anyone whom I could address. I'm already spent too much time on that list trying to convince everyone that I'm ready to take all the burden of using unsupported packages, but was told that it's against Fedora policies. What much could I do?


Having read the thread, you seem to miss the point that's been repeatedly made: the packages occasionally fail to build, and someone has to fix them.  That act, fixing packages when they don't build is the "support" that someone has to provide.

You can't use packages that don't exist.  They don't exist unless someone supports them.  Therefore you can't use an unsupported package.  It's not because policy forbids it, it's because they don't exist without the act of a human maintainer making them build (which is described as "supporting" the package.)

Does that make sense?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux