Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On 9/9/19 12:47 PM, vvs vvs wrote:
> 
> 
> Having read the thread, you seem to miss the point that's been 
> repeatedly made: the packages occasionally fail to build, and someone 
> has to fix them.  That act, fixing packages when they don't build is the 
> "support" that someone has to provide.

Koji still builds the i686 packages by default even on F32


> You can't use packages that don't exist.  They don't exist unless 
> someone supports them.  Therefore you can't use an unsupported package.  
> It's not because policy forbids it, it's because they don't exist 
> without the act of a human maintainer making them build (which is 
> described as "supporting" the package.)
> 
> Does that make sense?

No!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux