On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:16:09PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 28. 08. 19 9:32, Clement Verna wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019, 15:35 Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx > > <mailto:mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > > If updates in rawhide gating fail the tests, what is the procedure? Should they > > be unpuhsed, or left to rot forever? > > > > > > There are a few options here, fix the package so that the tests pass, > > disable the tests, or waive the results. If none of these are done then > > yes the update will just stay there to rot. > > I meant what to do with the broken updates that are actually broken. When a > new update is created, the older one doesn't seem to be obsoleted or > unpushed. I'm not sure I understand what you mean. What do you mean with "Broken updates that are actually broken"? We did think about obsoleting updates when a newer one is created but decided not to (if for some reasons -1's tests take longer than -2's, the outcome of -1's tests run may still be of interest for the packager and yum/dnf will anyway prefer the higher version). Is the issue about updates lingering in -testing? Pierre _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
