Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Neal Gompa wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 7:22 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Not really. It would break the legacy "install all packages as multilib
>> if available" mode, which has not been the default modus operandi of YUM
>> for years now. Does DNF even support this mode? (That mode would break
>> because the depsolver would attempt multilibbing all packages including
>> ones which are not intended to be multilib and hence contain multilib
>> conflicts.) But the default "install only the multilibs that are actually
>> required by some 32-bit-only package" mode should work just fine with
>> that setup (and IMHO, that is the only multilib mode that makes sense
>> anyway).
> 
> This is definitely supported, as this is how multilib works on Mageia
> and OpenMandriva today, both of which use DNF too.

But that doesn't mean Fedora has to continue supporting the broken mode. ;-) 
Why would you want to install all libraries as multilib even if nothing 32-
bit uses them? It's just a huge waste of bandwidth and disk space.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux