Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > It would be much clearer and user-friendly to move I*86 packages out of > the 64 bit repos and make the i*86 an optional add-on +1 to that suggestion. Vitaly Zaitsev via devel replied: > It will break multilib. Not really. It would break the legacy "install all packages as multilib if available" mode, which has not been the default modus operandi of YUM for years now. Does DNF even support this mode? (That mode would break because the depsolver would attempt multilibbing all packages including ones which are not intended to be multilib and hence contain multilib conflicts.) But the default "install only the multilibs that are actually required by some 32-bit-only package" mode should work just fine with that setup (and IMHO, that is the only multilib mode that makes sense anyway). And it would remove the overhead of fetching the metadata for all those multilib packages for all those users running pure 64-bit systems. (It would increase the total metadata for the multilib users though, unless the repository contains only multilib packages, in which case it would be useless to build packages against, including those multilib packages themselves.) Kevin Kofler _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx