Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It would be much clearer and user-friendly to move I*86 packages out of the 64 bit repos and make the i*86 an optional add-on

Le July 14, 2019 9:27:03 PM UTC, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 5:21 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/14/19 1:15 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> > This will also make it impossible for people to locally do multilib
>> > build/installs. It will remove COPR’s ability to do the same. For
>that
>> > reason alone, I don’t particularly want this change to happen.
>>
>> Can you expand on what you mean by 'locally do' ?
>>
>> Current multilib packages will still be available in the x86_64 repo.
>> Users can still install them from there just fine.
>>
>> If a user wants to locally build a i686 package, they can use mock
>> against the koji i686 buildroot repo to do so. They could then put
>that
>> package in a local repo with x86_64 packages and run createrepo on
>it.
>>
>> It's true there would be no easily mirrored i386 for them to copy to
>> aviod the internet, but is that really a big use case?
>>
>> Finally, if you would prefer this not happen now, is there a time
>when
>> you would further down the road? Whats the critera/goalpost/cutoff?
>>
>
>Building library packages and making your own multilib repo is
>impossible without having both the i686 repo and the x86_64 repo, as
>you need to build for both and then munge them together for a multilib
>repo.
>
>Historically, we really haven’t wanted people to pull from the Koji
>repo, and we probably still don’t want to do that, since it’s not
>mirrored and stressing it could cause more problems our already
>overtaxed build system environment.
>
>From my point of view, I don’t think it’s worth getting rid of the
>32-bit x86 repo until we’re at the point where people would not need
>to build their own multilib repositories. The cost of generating that
>for mirroring isn’t that high relative to the amount of pain we’ll
>cause for external folks trying to build off Fedora.
>
>Think, for example, the repo that shall not be named. That project’s
>Koji instance pulls in Fedora through the mirrored content as an
>external source, which feeds its ability to do multilib builds.
>
>I’m sorry, but I don’t see us getting rid of this for the foreseeable
>future without breaking virtually all of our downstreams.
>
>
>
>
>--
>真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
>_______________________________________________
>devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Fedora Code of Conduct:
>https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>List Archives:
>https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux