Re: Tagging commit hashes of Koji builds in dist-git

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Bruno Wolff, III:

> On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 08:37:57 -0000,
>  Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>On 2019-06-06, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Might be worth asking if there's a reason to need this offline. If the
>>> exact commit ID is stored in Koji and is authoritative, also tagging
>>> it into git might be convenient for offline purposes. The fact that
>>> it's not immutable is probably not an issue as long as the
>>> authoritative site *is*. (e.g. The same script that gets the hash from
>>> Koji could also detect if someone manually changed it in git, which
>>> would probably qualify as suspicious behavior.)
>>
>>If tags in dist-git could disagree with Koji, people could not rely on
>>them and would use Koji instead rendering tags in dist-tag useless.
>
> Would having signed tags help?

No, the tags must recide in a namespace, and dist-git (i.e.,
src.fedoraproject.org) must restrict who can push into that namespace.

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux