On Thursday, 14 March 2019 at 10:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 14. 03. 19 7:51, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: [...] > > Maybe what we need is to have koji for example refusing epoch bumps > > (and thus failing the build) if _not bumping_ epoch would _not break_ > > the upgrade path to ensure that epoch is only ever increased when we > > need to force a downgrade or when upstream changes versioning schemes > > in a way not considered an upgrade by RPM's NVR. > > Or use Pull Requests in the workflow and have somebody else review the > commit before it gets to Fedora? While that's a good idea in general, how do you propose to implement this for packages that have only a single maintainer? Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
