Re: On not bumping the epoch in ceph-14, f30 and f31/rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14. 03. 19 7:51, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 9:08 PM Kaleb Keithley <kkeithle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The epoch was inadvertently bumped (not by me) when ceph was rebased to 14.x in f30/rawhide.

It just occurred to me that this was a normal update when epoch was
increased, right?

Maybe what we need is to have koji for example refusing epoch bumps
(and thus failing the build) if _not bumping_ epoch would _not break_
the upgrade path to ensure that epoch is only ever increased when we
need to force a downgrade or when upstream changes versioning schemes
in a way not considered an upgrade by RPM's NVR.

Or use Pull Requests in the workflow and have somebody else review the commit before it gets to Fedora?

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux