On 14. 03. 19 12:33, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Thursday, 14 March 2019 at 10:06, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 14. 03. 19 7:51, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
[...]
Maybe what we need is to have koji for example refusing epoch bumps
(and thus failing the build) if _not bumping_ epoch would _not break_
the upgrade path to ensure that epoch is only ever increased when we
need to force a downgrade or when upstream changes versioning schemes
in a way not considered an upgrade by RPM's NVR.
Or use Pull Requests in the workflow and have somebody else review the
commit before it gets to Fedora?
While that's a good idea in general, how do you propose to implement
this for packages that have only a single maintainer?
Offer PR review swaps?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
