Peter Robinson wrote: > So going back to memory of what we did in the F-21 cycle, we EOLed > F-19 at the 13 months line and then F-20 continued until a month after > F-22 was out. No, we did not! F19 was supported until a month after F21 was released: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/Schedule ← F21 release 2014-12-09 https://fedoramagazine.org/fedora-19-eol-01-06-2015/ ← F19 EOL 2015-01-06 and that it what needs to happen to meet the promises we made to users. The whole point of the support cycle is to allow upgrading to Fn+2 directly. EOLing the release early because Fn+2 was delayed totally defeats the point. If we are not prepared to do that, we simply must not prolong the F30 cycle arbitrarily. I don't see why we need to do that to begin with. Infrastructure work can be done in parallel with distribution development. Extending the release cycle is only useful if it actually leads to extended support times for the releases! Kevin Kofler _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
