No, we did NOT do that. A quick search on the devel list archives shows that F19 was released in July 2013: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/SSLJL6ZJC7M7TAOPNHJY7UAS7MA66PMR/ ...and EOL'd on in January 2015: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/OKQNYF6AL5WVHIQB7G3MLIYFUXO37U2Z/ ...which gives F19 a 19-month support window. I wasn't a packager back then, so it may be easy for me to say this, but either way - I agree with Kevin Koffer. The current Release Life Cycle states that release N is supported for one month after N+2 is released. This is a promise we make to our users, and breaking this promise would be a very nasty thing to do. If we arrive at the conclusion that we don't have the manpower to extend F29's support window past the usual 13 months, then I argue that we should NOT prolong the F30 development cycle. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
