On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 08:45:55AM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > > If F31 is delayed by 6 months and F30 is supported for 6 months longer, > > does it mean F29 *also* automatically gets a longer cycle since it by > > policy becomes EOL when F31 is out + 1 month? > > Can we EOL F29 6 months before F31 is out to not have *two* long term > > branches to maintain? > So going back to memory of what we did in the F-21 cycle, we EOLed > F-19 at the 13 months line and then F-20 continued until a month after > F-22 was out. I'd support doing this again. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
