On 28/11/2018 08:45, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 7:14 AM Kalev Lember <kalevlember@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If F31 is delayed by 6 months and F30 is supported for 6 months longer,
does it mean F29 *also* automatically gets a longer cycle since it by
policy becomes EOL when F31 is out + 1 month?
Can we EOL F29 6 months before F31 is out to not have *two* long term
branches to maintain?
So going back to memory of what we did in the F-21 cycle, we EOLed
F-19 at the 13 months line and then F-20 continued until a month after
F-22 was out.
End of life is not technically defined as a given number of months but
rather it is defined as one month after the release of the next but one
release so unless that definition was changed that is what would happen:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle#End_of_Life_.28EOL.29
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (tom@xxxxxxxxxx)
http://compton.nu/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
