Re: Proposal: delay F31 release to work out infrastructure and lifecycle challenges

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthew Miller wrote:
> I know it was a big time-off holiday week in the US, but I expected a
> little more interest in this post. Perhaps it seemed like too much text to
> digest along with turkey and stuffing. :) I'm highlighting it with a
> subject reflecting the big, direct impact, and here's some other top-level
> proposals:
> 
> * embrace Taiga (an open source kanban tool) for project planning
> * fix the compose speed (target: one hour!)
> * really actually for real gated Rawhide
> * better CI pipeline tests for everything
> * define a base platform -- Red Hat wants to focus resources here
> * better tooling for non-base deliverables
> * better metrics for everything

And why do we need to stop the presses to do that? This is entirely 
orthogonal to distribution development and can be done in parallel.

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux