Dne 16. 11. 18 v 10:38 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Dne 16. 11. 18 v 0:54 Jason Tibbitts napsal(a): >>>>>>> "MM" == Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> MM> How would we balance this with getting people new stuff fast as >> MM> well? >> >> Wait, what? Certainly you're not suggesting trying to do an extended >> lifecycle that also gets all the new stuff. That's seems like a >> contradiction in terms. > > This last paragraph you could already apply to EPEL and this is > specifically reason why I don't bother to maintain anything in EPEL. > Just to clarify, I don't mind backporting security patches into Ruby 1.8.7 in RHEL6, but if there were since that time Ruby 1.9.3, 2.0.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5 in modules, SCLs or whatever else, I can tell you that would become quickly PITA. I am not even mentioning the whole Ruby ecosystem .... Vít _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
