Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 01:54, Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> My recollection is that meaningful discussion usually stopped at the
> kernel issue.  At one point we had some basic agreement that people who
> cared were welcome to push to old branches of things to keep them going,
> but that was back when we had per-branch ACLs.  But that never happened,
> and as there was no effort to actually compose updates for those
> releases, it doesn't matter much anyway.

In this respect (the kernel), it's true that something changed
compared to a decade ago: there was no LTS support upstream then. Now,
there is.

-- 
Iñaki Úcar
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux