Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 13 November 2018 23:36:38 GMT, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
>Hi everyone! Let's talk about something new and exciting.

Assuming a system that is automatically updating, but doesn't get upgraded to the next fedora release - a system like this needs to degrade progressively but securely: after thirteen months GUI applications are unsupported and are actively removed by dnf updates; after four years network servers are unsupported, shut down and removed; after seven years sshd is removed, default runlevel set to 1; after ten years runlevel is set to zero.

This is how you allow longer term support for server applications, without supporting old GUI software, and without leaving zombie machines (and virtual machines) laying around on the net causing trouble. This would be responsible lifecycle management.

-- 
Bruno
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux