On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 09:36:01AM -0600, mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > We need to rebase GNOME within about two months of the new upstream > releases, or we'll lose our edge with the GNOME community. We'd be > ceding our position as best GNOME distro to Ubuntu and Arch. So a > one-year cycle means a major GNOME version update will need to land > in the middle of a release to avoid that. And these do not have a > good reputation for stability. Basically we'll wind up with a bunch > of bugs landing halfway through the release, and without the usual > Fedora QA process to ensure the most important of them get fixed > before they reach users. So I can't support this plan.... Is there a way we could do these as ".1" releases, with orchestrated QA for the big update rather than a whole release? Or, if we can combine this with having a gated Rawhide meant for day-to-day use (and using ostree for rollbacks), would that be adequate for the "on the edge" GNOME community? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
