Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 04:29:22PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 11/14/18 4:08 PM, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 06:12:11 +0100, you wrote:
> > 
> > > We, as a distro, just take a different approach.
> > > To be bleeding edge requires to have releases often.
> > 
> > Such a bleeding edge distro that it took 4 years for Swift to arrive,
> > or still trying to get rid of Python 2.
> 
> Fedora has become "bleeding edge" in sense of being unstable, unreliable and
> containing immature, experimental features.

IME the opposite has happened - I see far less instability and
breakage when upgrading to a new Fedora release these days, than
experienced in the past.  Even rawhide doesn't destroy systems
as frequently as it did in the past.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux