Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 01:58:13PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Because each old version is different? The fact that a backport has
> been made for RHEL does not mean that this backport is appropriate for
> the given Fedora version. Iff this was so simple, we could just take
> CentOS packages and compile them for Fedora.

Well, in a lot of cases, we *could*.


> In my experience, backporting even to older version of Fedora is
> proportional to the number of branches. This is because the diff between
> F-2 and F-1 is just as large (on average) as the diff between F-1 and F.

Yeah, definitely. We can't do this in a way which significantly increases
the number of active branches.


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux