>>>>> "IU" == Iñaki Ucar <iucar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: IU> I see. Anyway, I suppose that it's healthy to preserve some manual IU> intervention in these sections. Well, it would be super great if we didn't have to do that and one day RPM might give us some reasonable way to generate more of the specfile based on the contents of the source files. See https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/104 But even if we get that, you won't be able to use it on anything but rawhide for some time. IU> You can count on that. I'll try to identify corner cases to see how IU> your macros behave in such packages and report back as time permits. I'm certainly happy to develop them in tandem with your investigations. I have no expectation that what I banged out yesterday is remotely complete, but it at least shows that for at least a couple of packages you can hide rather a lot of the details behind macros. I think the next step is for me to stuff those macros in a temporary pagure repo. We can track what's missing with tickets and then eventually get the macros packaged up so that they can be used in the buildsystem. - J< _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
