Re: Fedora Packaging Guidelines on docs.fedoraproject.org

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:00 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:02 AM Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Dne 2.10.2018 v 13:11 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 11:53:45AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Dne 1.10.2018 v 20:00 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a):
> > >>>>>>>> "BP" == Björn Persson <Bjorn@rombobjörn.se> writes:
> > >>> BP> This was on Fedora 27. So one needs Fedora 28 to help fixing the
> > >>> BP> formatting of the guidelines then? (Once that other breakage is
> > >>> BP> fixed I suppose?)
> > >>>
> > >>> I believe one could build the antora stack from scratch instead of using
> > >>> a container.  I would hope it wouldn't require F28 to do so, but it's
> > >>> still way too high of a barrier.
> > >>>
> > >>> BP> Yeah, no I don't think I'm going to run any document conversion
> > >>> BP> programs as root.
> > >>>
> > >>> You certainly shouldn't have to.  The problem is making it look like it
> > >>> looks on the web site, since I guess the markup itself is dependent on
> > >>> stylesheets and extra information which isn't actually included in the
> > >>> documents.
> > >>>
> > >>> For a single page, though, it seems that you can get a reasonable
> > >>> interpretation merely by installing asciidoc and running "asciidoc
> > >>> foo.adoc".
> > >> For a single page, it would be nice if Pagure supported .adoc as it
> > >> supports other makrdowns
> > > There is a ticket asking just for this. We'll get to it sooner or later.
> > >
> > >> ...
> > > Not quite sure what this implies
> >
> > It is just surprising it is not supported yet out of the box by whatever
> > library you are using to convert other markups to html.
> >
>
> Pagure is in Python. There are now no useful implementations of *.adoc
> renderers in Python. It's not that surprising.

After a bit of looking around, it looks like almost no code
highlighting tool supports AsciiDoc (yet). Neither pygments (python)
nor rouge (ruby) support it.

The only "libraries" supporting AsciiDoc that I could find were
highlight.js and prism.js. But, looking at pagure's source code, it
already seems to use highlight.js. Maybe it's just a version without
AsciiDoc support enabled?

Side note: Is AsciiDoc really such an obscure format?

Fabio

> --
> 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux