Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

[Manas Mangaonkar <manasmangaonkar@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:56 PM, Samuel Sieb <samuel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/23/2018 10:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> Available Packages
>> kernel.src        4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28
>> pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora
>
>
> This is what I get:
>
> # dnf list --all kernel
> Installed Packages
> kernel.x86_64                         4.16.11-300.fc28
> @updates
> kernel.x86_64                         4.17.4-200.fc28
> @updates-testing
> kernel.x86_64                         4.17.7-200.fc28
> @updates
> Available Packages
> kernel.src                            4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28
> pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora
> kernel.x86_64                         4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28
> pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora
>
> That last one is highlighted in blue.  The problem is that it seems to only
> show packages that would be an upgrade, even though "--all" should override
> that.  Try adding "--showduplicates", that gives me:
>
> # dnf list --all --showduplicates kernel
> Installed Packages
> kernel.x86_64                         4.16.11-300.fc28
> @updates
> kernel.x86_64                         4.17.4-200.fc28
> @updates-testing
> kernel.x86_64                         4.17.7-200.fc28
> @updates
> Available Packages
> kernel.x86_64                         4.16.3-301.fc28                fedora
> kernel.x86_64                         4.16.11-300.fc28
> @updates
> kernel.x86_64                         4.17.4-200.fc28
> @updates-testing
> kernel.x86_64                         4.17.7-200.fc28
> @updates
> kernel.x86_64                         4.17.7-200.fc28                updates
> kernel.src                            4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28
> pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora
> kernel.x86_64                         4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28
> pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora
>
> Now it shows me the old one from the initial fedora release repo as well.

[chris@f28h ~]$ sudo dnf list --all --showduplicates kernel
[sudo] password for chris:
Last metadata expiration check: 0:39:32 ago on Tue 24 Jul 2018 11:21:48 AM MDT.
Installed Packages
kernel.x86_64     4.17.3-200.fc28               @@commandline
kernel.x86_64     4.17.4-200.fc28               @@commandline
kernel.x86_64     4.17.6-200.fc28               @@commandline
kernel.x86_64     4.17.7-200.fc28               @@commandline
kernel.x86_64     4.18.0-0.rc3.git1.1.fc29      @@commandline
kernel.x86_64     4.18.0-0.rc4.git2.1.fc29      @@commandline
kernel.x86_64     4.18.0-0.rc5.git1.1.fc29      @@commandline
Available Packages
kernel.x86_64     4.16.3-301.fc28               fedora
kernel.x86_64     4.17.3-200.fc28               @@commandline
kernel.x86_64     4.17.4-200.fc28               @@commandline
kernel.x86_64     4.17.6-200.fc28               @@commandline
kernel.x86_64     4.17.7-200.fc28               @@commandline
kernel.x86_64     4.17.7-200.fc28               updates
kernel.src        4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28
pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora
kernel.x86_64     4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28
pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora
kernel.x86_64     4.18.0-0.rc3.git1.1.fc29      @@commandline
kernel.x86_64     4.18.0-0.rc4.git2.1.fc29      @@commandline
kernel.x86_64     4.18.0-0.rc5.git1.1.fc29      @@commandline
[chris@f28h ~]$ sudo dnf install kernel-4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28.x86_64
Last metadata expiration check: 0:42:59 ago on Tue 24 Jul 2018 11:21:48 AM MDT.
Dependencies resolved.
====================================================================================================
 Package
        Arch   Version                   Repository
                        Size
====================================================================================================
Installing:
 kernel x86_64 4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28
pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora  48 k
Installing dependencies:
 kernel-core
        x86_64 4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28
pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora  26 M
 kernel-modules
        x86_64 4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28
pac23-High_Performance_Clear_LInux_kernel_for_Fedora  29 M

Transaction Summary
====================================================================================================
Install  3 Packages

Total download size: 54 M
Installed size: 91 M
Is this ok [y/N]:


OK so it has to be explicitly named. I'm not sure what happens if
there ends up being a name conflict with two enabled repos though, I
guess I'd have to disablerepo for updates and u-t to force it to use
the one in the copr.


--
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SZGW72AQ4RR4Q4RIOHECUVJET63YVEM7/

I will rebuild it to fix this,also whoever that was concerned with the swapping process issue i am working on it,also a issue has been created upstream,the person who did it for arch reported similar issues too. 

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/J55PLENW6KVTROXUORARARP7E47D2LI7/