Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




>The upstream non LTS kernels have had the mitigation for
>meltdown/spectre longer than LTS and they likely have more robust
>implementations. All Fedora releases have had fixes for some time.

    I meant the clear linux kernel,they seem to have diff kernel bundles and i want to go with the Lts one.
 

> To get your feet wet, you could build a standard Fedora kernel using
> one of these processes.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/quick-docs/en-US/kernel/build-custom-kernel.html
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel/Source_RPM
>
> Then, when you have that working, use the same procedure to build the
> clear linux kernel from source.  That way you know that both compile
> individually.
>
> The final step is just to ensure that once the Fedora kernel is patched
> to support clear linux, it compiles also.  Then it will support the
> Fedora enhancements to the kernel that haven't made it upstream yet
> (and might never), and will run on any fedora system.
>
> I don't know if the clear linux kernel is compatible with other
> architectures and video hardware.  If it isn't, it can only be run on
> x86_64 with intel video hardware (no nvidia or amd additional video
> hardware).  If it isn't compatible with other architectures or video
> hardware, I don't think it makes sense to compile it as a Fedora
> kernel, so you would be done after you get it building from source.
> Not sure how useful such a kernel would be.
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SDS3J723DDZB6VNXHD2DVD2STHC7TDSY/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BA3RBXY3PYJ4U2H5LCLJ6ZWTX4FITDGS/

The clear linux does run on amd hardware,at phoronix they tried it on the new eypec cpu line from amd. Performs well and wont hinder performance. 

> hardware, I don't think it makes sense to compile it as a Fedora
> kernel, so you would be done after you get it building from source.
> Not sure how useful such a kernel would be.

No nvidia or amd gpu support though.But for those who want pure computing power for containers etc this can be a solid option,it does perform much better than other linux distro kernels. 

I find this interesting,and a fun learning experience to get my feet wet.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/WM466U5UGPREDPXWSTKNSQ6RDD672GMB/

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux