On 07/12/2018 07:45 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > I second that. When we mass filled PRs with python2 related changes it > was always a Red Hat maintained software, where people were basically > telling us: "no, we won't accept your PR here, we maintain the specfile > somewhere else". It was very unpleasant experience and usually such > maintainers expects us to: > > 1) find their canonical spec file location and figure out what special > branch we need to apply the patch to > > 2) wait for a new release of their software to happen and specfile > changes be "backported" into Fedora (sometimes took months) > > Some maintainers were kinder than others, taking the changes and > applying them in their god-knows-where mainained spec files. Some where > not. > > We don't need to make the rule less strict, we need to find a way to > enforce it. The current state (people ignoring this rule) makes > contributing to Fedora even harder than it already is. I don't see that there is any way to enforce it. I suppose you could try and have a hook to detect it, but it could well have false positives and block legit commits. Perhaps once we no longer use specs we can solve this. ;) kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/ZWAJZFLRKLQACQIEY4BGELZLU4OI7TCB/
