On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 8:23 AM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/04/2018 11:28 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> >> On 06/04/2018 10:50 AM, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > >> It should, because -march=x86-64 implies just SSE2 and FXSR, and Xeon MP >> supports both. But the intent is what the subject says: i686 binaries are >> for running legacy software on x86-64 systems, and nothing more. > > > I do not agree with this sentiment all, as well as I can't deny finding your > wording bewildering, because I think you actually are trying to say: > > - You (Florian) want to abandon the i686 architecture. > - You (RH) want to play down the fact Fedora 28 is FUBARed on the PIII and > instead of fixing the issues you want to kill it. > I don't think RH is trying to hide anything here. The i686 SIG was created specifically to handle issues like this. What are they doing to fix it? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/5JTHNVTE6J5KV6DRGQ7J2NSZHRUOEGZ5/
