On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 10:09 AM Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 06/04/2018 11:28 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > On 06/04/2018 10:50 AM, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > > It should, because -march=x86-64 implies just SSE2 and FXSR, and Xeon MP > > supports both. But the intent is what the subject says: i686 binaries > > are for running legacy software on x86-64 systems, and nothing more. > > I do not agree with this sentiment all, as well as I can't deny finding > your wording bewildering, because I think you actually are trying to say: > > - You (Florian) want to abandon the i686 architecture. > - You (RH) want to play down the fact Fedora 28 is FUBARed on the PIII > and instead of fixing the issues you want to kill it. I'm going to be as clear as I possibly can here. Red Hat, as a company, is not going to put resources into fixing issues found on Pentium III machines in Fedora, regardless of whether or not this proposal passes. There is an x86 SIG who was tasked with that kind of activity. The SIG should be fixing the issues it has responsibility for. josh _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/JP7FTOLHV4M2ZCMBO7V7QKPSH3DTAAXR/
