On 13.03.2018 01:02, Athos Ribeiro wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:35:19AM +0100, René Genz wrote: >> I propose to: >> add a new major point 2, so: >> "2. How to join the Fedora Package Collection Maintainers?" >> will be: >> "3. How to join the Fedora Package Collection Maintainers?" >> >> The new major point 2 would be something like: >> ---8<--- >> 2. Notes for one-off contributors >> >> Your contribution is welcome. >> >> At first you must <Create a Fedora Account (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers?rd=PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_a_Fedora_Account)>. >> >> Before proceeding, please sync your account by login on https://src.fedoraproject.org/ using your FAS credentials. > > See 2.3.1 - It deals with the FAS account creation. Maybe you could link > there to avoid replication :) > The proposed link: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers?rd=PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_a_Fedora_Account links to section 2.1.3 "Create a Fedora Account". Or do you recommend the following link for the same target? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Create_a_Fedora_Account >> >> At the moment any repos, including forks, on https://src.fedoraproject.org require your FAS account to have 'packager' status for write access (and read access if you use the "SSH" Source GIT URL). >> >> Either you get the status or you use a <Remote pull-request (https://docs.pagure.org/pagure/usage/pull_requests.html#remote-git-to-pagure-pull-request)>, f.e. with <Pagure (https://pagure.io/new)>, as a workaround. >> The requirement to be a packager is being worked on. >> ---8<--- > > I would rather see something like: > > If you are not an Fedora packager, i.e., you are not in the 'packager' > FAS group, you can send pull requests to src.fedoraproject.org. To do > so, you must use a <Remote pull-request > (https://docs.pagure.org/pagure/usage/pull_requests.html#remote-git-to-pagure-pull-request)>, > f.e. with <Pagure (https://pagure.io/new)> > Your proposal is easier to read. I will use it. To explain why non-packager have to use remote pull-requests, instead of forking on src.fedoraproject.org, I would append something like: Any repos on https://src.fedoraproject.org, including forks, are read-only for non-packager. Only packager can write. It is being worked on that forks will be writable for non-packager. > Also, I do not understood what you meant with > > "The requirement to be a packager is being worked on." As far as I remember that is what puiterwijk wrote in the IRC channel. Due to read-only forks for non-packager on src.fedoraproject.org the code must be hosted on a remote git repo and a remote pull-requests must be used. I assume puiterwijk meant that in the future forks on src.fedoraproject.org will be writable for non-packager. >> >> What do you think? > > I think it is valuable information and should be added to the wiki :) > Thanks! > Thank you for your support and help. :) >> I can edit the wiki. > > Can you? Note that to edit the wiki you must be in at least one extra > FAS group other the the CLA ones. > In my FAS account one group reads "wikiedit (user)". I requested that membership in order to fix a wrong command in a SSSD or FreeIPA testcase in the wiki during Fedora 26 branching as far as I remember. -- Kind regards, René _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
